Book Review Archive 15.09.02 [50] |
|
Fifty Years of Special Operations by Stephen Dorril
The same culprits
turn up again and again, same shopworn tactics - recruiting ex Nazi collaborators,
war criminals, to get behind the Iron Curtain. Ex SOE types train cloak
and dagger private armies, but the infiltrators are often infiltrated, the
Soviets using double cross networks. Dorril is keen to play down Philby,
stressing internecine émigré politics and tunnel vision by MI6 analysts.
Nascent guerrilla groups in post WW2 East Europe did not enjoy popular support,
and the Cold War did not turn hot enough to use them. We see the usual gamut
of spook tactics including disinformation, Zinoviev style forgeries, rigged
elections.
Often their tricks proved inept, like the propaganda leaflets sent by balloon,
and blown back in the wrong direction. (Dorril does not seem aware that
the RAF did the same thing, with the same result in the early days of WW2)
A great deal of their activity was sheer evil; the interference in Greece,
the doomed infiltrations into the Baltic states or Albania. Perhaps the
worst is the allegation that a Jewish refugee ship was sunk, [p 547 ff]
which Dorril does not follow up. Presumably this ship had a name, owners,
a passenger list, a date of sinking.
The real problem with this book is
that its breadth is a hindrance. Each episode can only be treated at a superficial
level, and Dorril's work much depends on earlier material, so to that extent
it is really a compilation of secondary literature. His previous book, 'The
Silent Conspiracy' suffers in a similar way. This long [Robin] Cook's tour
through Acronym Reich looks impressive, but suffers from the necessary lack
of real depth imposed by this urgent need to move on. Many of the really
interesting matters (the Anglo-French plot to attack the Russian oil fields
at Baku eg) are not properly investigated. Important questions are not asked:
Why did General Vlasov change sides? Why did Sikorski crash at Gibraltar?
Various myths are accepted uncritically; MI6 manipulated America into WW2
by plotting against the Isolationists, or European unity was originally
an MI6 sponsored wheeze against Communism, for example.
It would have been better shorter, and focused.
There is a myth that the
spooks secretly control everything, which I think Dorril really believes,
what we have here is a glorified history of office politics. The whole world
at your fingertips, a card index, this secret history includes everything.
(or would like to). Ultimately, this book shows how the rise of the intelligence
services mirrors the real decay of the British political establishment.
It takes him 600 pages to reach Suez (1956) which leaves him just 200 more
for the next four decades. A better writer would have paced himself. The
closer to the present, the faster and more superficial it gets. All the
opera cape and gaslight fake politics about Intermarium and the Promethean
League masks the important point that this is essentially their version,
the one they want you to believe. Like their new Vauxhall Cross HQ, it owes
a good deal to Busby Berkeley.
In and out, round and twist; the groups and
plots create a shape viewed from above. If Dorril is cast as Fred Astaire,
Ginger Rogers could be the aptly named Mrs Dangerfield. Spin's the thing,
but in order to spot the dogs that don't bark, you need to know where the
dogs are. The Mull of Kintyre Chinook helicopter crash? The death of Princess
Diana? Dorril fights shy of these matters.
This book should be understood
in the light of MI6 having to recast itself in the post Cold War NWO era
of 'avowal', mafia crime, drugs, super terrorism and Terry Farrell HQs.
In all conscience, not to be recommended, this book is one of interest to
really committed spook spotters, but not at all for the general reader.
|
BLUE is looking for short fiction, extracts of novels, poetry, lyrics,
polemics, opinions, eyewitness accounts, news, features, information and arts
in any form relating to eco cultural- social- spiritual issues, events and
activites (creative and political). Send to Newsdesk. |